The “Inappropriate Relationship”

One of the most difficult things for the surviving votaries of the Pierce cult to accept is that there was pretty clearly, to use a Clintonian phrase, an “inappropriate relationship” between William L. Pierce and Federal law enforcement.
How else to explain Pierce’s absence from the defendants’ table during the 1988 Fort Smith Sedition trials, since according to Federal affidavits and court testimony he accepted stolen Order money? How else to explain Pierce’s incredible ability to slither out of any legal accountability for criminal activity going on all around him, especially the activity of one subordinate who is now generally acknowledged to be a long-term ADL or SPLC plant? How else to explain the fact that Pierce was not shut down after the Oklahoma City bombing, which was patterned exactly after The Turner Diaries? How else to explain his astounding ability, not granted to any other American rightist, to sashay through Germany at will unmolested, trailing secret police arrests in his wake but never so much as a hair on his head touched? How else to explain the utterly astonishing Hendrik Mõbus incident?
The Feds and groups like the ADL always like to maintain at least one major White nationalist group as a listening post so they can monitor and analyze the depth of White discontent and spot any troublemakers who might “break the plantation” and actually end up doing something to annoy the power structure. It is fairly clear that during his lifetime Pierce held the “franchise” for this, and in return like all informants he was allowed to get away with at least minor criminal activity. Since Pierce’s death, such events as the granting of a passport to David Duke after his conviction as a Federal felon have fueled speculation that Duke has taken over the “franchise.”